5 Questions to Ask to Improve CEO Skills

As mar­ket con­di­tions and cap­i­tal avail­abil­i­ty change, it has become much more obvi­ous which man­age­ment teams and CEOs have been man­ag­ing effec­tive­ly and which have not (but have ben­e­fit­ed from a ris­ing tide). So, I thought this would be a good time to remind you how to be an effec­tive CEO and improve your over­all CEO skills.

The CEO has two pri­ma­ry roles: strat­e­gy + exe­cu­tion.

Strat­e­gy is the dis­ci­pline of mak­ing good deci­sions.

Exe­cu­tion is mak­ing sure that the things you expect­ed to get done actu­al­ly got done.

If you make good deci­sions and your team exe­cutes well, you have a far bet­ter chance of being suc­cess­ful.

Questions to Ask to Improve Your CEO Skills

List­ed below are five ques­tions CEOs need to answer (in pri­or­i­ty order for the CEO role specif­i­cal­ly):

  1. What?
  2. Who?
  3. When?
  4. Why?
  5. How?

Let’s dis­cuss each one in more detail:

1. What?

What should we focus on as a com­pa­ny? This is the sin­gle most impor­tant ques­tion a CEO answers. Of the 100 things we could do, what is the one thing we want to focus all of our resources on accom­plish­ing?

The mis­take many less-expe­ri­enced CEOs make is that they pick a gener­ic goal as opposed to a strate­gic one.

A gener­ic goal has no trade­offs. It’s easy to agree to and requires no sac­ri­fice.

“We want to get to $100 mil­lion ARR in five years.”

“We want to be a uni­corn.”

These are finan­cial and val­u­a­tion goals.

A strate­gic goal is one where you decide what mech­a­nism you will use to achieve your finan­cial goal.

If your mar­ket has five cus­tomer seg­ments, sev­en geo­gra­phies, and four dis­tri­b­u­tion chan­nels avail­able, which com­bi­na­tion of cus­tomer, geog­ra­phy, and dis­tri­b­u­tion chan­nel will you use to achieve your finan­cial objec­tive?

If your answer is “all of them,” this is gener­ic, has no trade­offs, and is also not real­is­tic (unless you hap­pened to raise $100 mil­lion in cap­i­tal, and even then, it is often not pos­si­ble to do with only that amount of cap­i­tal).

The key to mak­ing a good what deci­sion is to focus on what I call a “winnable” war. You focus where you have a com­pet­i­tive advan­tage.

The mar­ket votes with its wal­let. The mar­ket is mer­ci­less. It cares not about your per­son­al sac­ri­fices. It just wants what it wants. You would be fool­ish to ignore how the mar­ket votes.

If a par­tic­u­lar cus­tomer seg­ment real­ly likes your com­pa­ny, fig­ure out why.

If a dif­fer­ent cus­tomer seg­ment that you real­ly want to pur­sue hates your offer­ing, you need to fig­ure out why.

Once you under­stand your com­pa­ny and the mar­ket, you need to place your bet. What will you focus on where you can win?

2. Who?

Who should you recruit or assign to achieve the company’s goal? In oth­er words, who is going to get the what (that you just decid­ed on) done?

If you pick the right goal but the wrong peo­ple, you will def­i­nite­ly fail.

This goes back to Jim Collin’s advice in the book Good to Great: “Get the right peo­ple on the bus.”

When I first read this decades ago, I remem­bered the phrase but didn’t appre­ci­ate it. Now that I’ve seen decades of “wrong peo­ple on the bus,” I’ve come to appre­ci­ate just how impor­tant the who deci­sion is to effec­tive­ly lead­ing a com­pa­ny.

3. When?

It is easy to be a CEO when you have access to unlim­it­ed cap­i­tal. Any fool can deploy $1 bil­lion in cap­i­tal to make $10 mil­lion in ARR.

The hard work comes when you have a resource con­straint… and you always have a resource con­straint. You have a con­straint in cap­i­tal. You have a con­straint in per­son­nel. You have a con­straint in time. You have a con­straint in atten­tion span and abil­i­ty to focus.

You always have a con­straint.

One of the key deci­sions a CEO makes is to sequence the objec­tives and the work need­ed to achieve the objec­tives.

If you decide a new prod­uct mod­ule makes sense, and going deep­er into a par­tic­u­lar dis­tri­b­u­tion chan­nel also makes sense, the ques­tion is when do you pur­sue the prod­uct invest­ment ver­sus the chan­nel invest­ment?

If you can’t do both, yet both make sense, when do you do each? Which comes first?

That is the when deci­sion.

You ide­al­ly want to pri­or­i­tize (from a sequenc­ing stand­point) the one option that: A) Has the biggest impact on the busi­ness rel­a­tive to its cost and risk; and B) Finan­cial­ly enables the oth­er option.

The specifics of this are high­ly sit­u­a­tion­al­ly depen­dent.

If going deep­er in a dis­tri­b­u­tion chan­nel will pro­vide the finan­cial returns to invest in prod­uct expan­sion, then do that. If expand­ing the prod­uct foot­print will enable a quick cross-sell to the exist­ing cus­tomers and pro­vide the return to fund expan­sion of dis­tri­b­u­tion for new cus­tomer acqui­si­tion, then do that instead.

The key is to dis­cern which deci­sion is the first “domi­no” that, when tipped, auto­mat­i­cal­ly knocks down sub­se­quent domi­noes.

4. Why?

Why did you make the deci­sions above? This ques­tion is about pro­vid­ing a deci­sion-mak­ing ratio­nale. How do you know you made the right deci­sion? If you have a strong board, your board will chal­lenge you on your deci­sion-mak­ing rea­son­ing or ratio­nale.

(And if you’re my SaaS CEO coach­ing client, I will chal­lenge your ratio­nale.)

Board mem­bers will not always know the right answer. But, they will quick­ly real­ize if a deci­sion lacks ratio­nale or has a flawed ratio­nale.

This process is known by a lot of col­lo­qui­al phras­es, such as “poke holes in your think­ing” or “stress test” the pro­posed deci­sion. Under stress and in a vac­u­um, it’s easy to make deci­sions with poor ratio­nale. If your deci­sion-mak­ing process is always the echo cham­ber of your own mind, it’s easy to have blind spots in your per­cep­tions, judg­ments, and ratio­nale.

A third of my CEOs are hyper-aggres­sive and have weak­ness­es in rec­og­niz­ing and man­ag­ing down­side risk.

A dif­fer­ent third of my CEOs are way too con­ser­v­a­tive. Their prof­it mar­gins are too high (and they get yelled at by me for this), and they under-invest in top-line growth.

CEOs with engi­neer­ing back­grounds want to solve all busi­ness prob­lems with code.

Sales-ori­ent­ed CEOs want to solve all busi­ness prob­lems by hir­ing more sales­peo­ple.

Nei­ther approach is uni­ver­sal­ly true all the time.

My role as a CEO coach/mentor is to be the oppo­site of my CEO’s default deci­sion-mak­ing ori­en­ta­tion.

A good enough prod­uct with stel­lar go-to-mar­ket dis­tri­b­u­tion and exe­cu­tion wins far more often than a per­fect prod­uct with zero dis­tri­b­u­tion.

Attempt­ing to dou­ble and triple sales when your prod­uct has a fun­da­men­tal­ly unscal­able, unsta­ble, and flawed tech­ni­cal archi­tec­ture (because your orig­i­nal premis­es were wrong and you nev­er focused on resolv­ing the tech debt you inad­ver­tent­ly cre­at­ed) will also cause your com­pa­ny to fall apart.

Being an effec­tive CEO requires cross-func­tion­al breadth. There is a time, place, and role for every func­tion­al area. Don’t try to solve an engi­neer­ing prob­lem with sales­peo­ple. Don’t try to solve a finan­cial management/mismanagement prob­lem with bet­ter brand­ing.

In short, if your deci­sion-mak­ing ratio­nale sucks, it’s very like­ly the deci­sion you’re about to make sucks too.

5. How?

The final deci­sion a CEO makes is the how deci­sion. To be more pre­cise, the final deci­sion the CEO is respon­si­ble for (but doesn’t always make) is the how deci­sion.

There are often mul­ti­ple ways to achieve an objec­tive.

If you want a par­tic­u­lar prod­uct capa­bil­i­ty, do you build it, buy it, or license it?

If you want more top-line sales growth, do you invest in more mar­ket­ing, more sales, more part­ners, or some com­bi­na­tion of the three?

If you’re under $5 mil­lion in ARR, you’re like­ly mak­ing most of these deci­sions your­self. If you’re in the $20 mil­lion to $50 mil­lion ARR range, your direct reports often make pro­pos­als for how they want to accom­plish a par­tic­u­lar out­come you assigned to them.

This is what a strong VP or C‑level offi­cer should be capa­ble of doing — propos­ing a how to the what you assigned to them dur­ing the who staffing process.

The mark of a good CEO in the $20 mil­lion to $50 mil­lion+ ARR is some­one who can stress test, poke holes in, and oth­er­wise chal­lenge the ratio­nale of the pro­pos­als from direct reports.

Now, what do you do if your com­pa­ny is in the $5 mil­lion to $20 mil­lion ARR range? This is an inter­est­ing time for a SaaS com­pa­ny.

I call it the puber­ty years of entre­pre­neur­ship. You have the needs of a big­ger com­pa­ny but can’t quite afford it. Dif­fer­ent parts of the busi­ness grow at dif­fer­ent rates. It’s an “awk­ward” stage of growth.

For exam­ple, at $5 mil­lion, you could real­ly ben­e­fit from a full-blown exec­u­tive team… yet busi­ness eco­nom­ics rarely allow you to afford it when you’d ide­al­ly want it.

You’re often tak­ing direc­tors and see­ing if they can rise to the occa­sion to be VP-lev­el exec­u­tives. One of the best ways to pro­vide pro­fes­sion­al devel­op­ment oppor­tu­ni­ties for your staff to become more senior lead­ers is to have them make deci­sion-mak­ing pro­pos­als.

Keep in mind that a big part of being an effec­tive exec­u­tive is mak­ing good deci­sions. Yet, it’s hard to get good at mak­ing deci­sions with­out hav­ing the chance to, well… make deci­sions.

Here’s how you close that gap.

Rather than mak­ing a deci­sion and telling them what task to do, assign them an out­come and ask for a pro­posed plan.

The key to becom­ing a “good decider” is to be a “good rec­om­mender” first.

This is how you grow and devel­op high-per­form­ing indi­vid­u­als to become future exec­u­tives.

In addi­tion to hav­ing up-and-com­ing man­agers make more pro­pos­als, the role of the CEO changes. Under $5 mil­lion ARR, the CEO has a hand in pret­ty much every deci­sion.

In the puber­ty years of scal­ing (rough­ly $5 mil­lion to $20 mil­lion in ARR), the CEO has to shift from mak­ing all the deci­sions to being an eval­u­a­tor (and coach) of oth­er people’s pro­posed deci­sions.

If every major deci­sion requires 100 hours of aggre­gate work to ful­ly research, ana­lyze, and decide/recommend, a good CEO can review four major deci­sions with­in two hours. That’s 400 hours of com­plex work done by oth­ers and resolved at the CEO lev­el in under two hours.

This is how you scale as a SaaS CEO. You encour­age, enable, and ask oth­ers to pro­pose how they rec­om­mend a goal be accom­plished.

If you’d like to work on your CEO skills by work­ing with me, here are a few options.

If your com­pa­ny is over $5 mil­lion in ARR (or will be short­ly), feel free to con­tact me for a com­pli­men­ta­ry assess­ment.

If you’re under $5 mil­lion in ARR, sub­mit the form below to be on the noti­fi­ca­tion list for class­es, work­shops, and train­ing pro­grams to help you become a more effec­tive CEO.

 
Yes, I want to receive emails on
How to Become a More Effec­tive CEO
 
First Name *
Email *

This form col­lects your email so that we can send you the free mate­ri­als you request­ed. Check out our Pri­va­cy Pol­i­cy for details on how we pro­tect and man­age your sub­mit­ted data.

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail
author avatar
Vic­tor Cheng
Author of Extreme Rev­enue Growth, Exec­u­tive coach, inde­pen­dent board mem­ber, and investor in SaaS com­pa­nies.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top