The 3 Prerequisites to Scaling a SaaS Business

Sil­i­con Val­ley cul­ture is hyper-focused on growth and scal­a­bil­i­ty. There is a right time to grow and scale. Many founder CEOs get the tim­ing wrong. The three pre­req­ui­sites to effec­tive­ly scal­ing are:

  1. Product/Market Fit
  2. Sales Mes­sage Res­o­nance
  3. Favor­able Cus­tomer Con­ver­sion Eco­nom­ics

Let’s dis­cuss each one.

1. Product/Market Fit

Product/market fit means you’ve iden­ti­fied a prob­lem that your tar­get cus­tomer wants solved, and your prod­uct actu­al­ly does solve the prob­lem.

If your prod­uct sucks, you don’t want to scale and tell even more peo­ple how crap­py your prod­uct is.

If your prod­uct works but you solve a prob­lem that cus­tomers don’t actu­al­ly care about, scal­ing means being irrel­e­vant at a larg­er scale and cost.

In both of these sce­nar­ios, you do not want to scale. You want to focus on a customer’s high-pri­or­i­ty prob­lem (e.g., will­ing to pay mon­ey to solve it) with a prod­uct that works (e.g., actu­al­ly solves the prob­lem).

Also, it does not mat­ter if you think you’ve solved the customer’s prob­lem; it only mat­ters if they think you did.

The core skills to do this well are: a) mar­ket empa­thy; b) prod­uct man­age­ment; and c) prod­uct devel­op­ment.

Most tech­ni­cal founder CEOs at prod­uct devel­op­ment and often much weak­er at prod­uct man­age­ment. I find mar­ket empa­thy skills to be hor­ri­bly lack­ing with many tech­ni­cal (and non-tech­ni­cal) founders.

2. Sales Mes­sage Res­o­nance

When you have a prod­uct that solves a customer’s high-pri­or­i­ty prob­lem, the next issue you need to resolve is devel­op­ing sales mes­sage res­o­nance with your tar­get mar­ket.

What are the “mag­ic” words that can be pre­sent­ed to the tar­get cus­tomer that get them to buy? How do you frame the prob­lem that you solve in such a way that oth­er alter­na­tive offer­ings aren’t even con­sid­ered? How do you describe the out­come your prod­uct deliv­ers as opposed to its fea­ture set? If your prod­uct can deliv­er mul­ti­ple out­comes, which is the one pri­ma­ry out­come that a cus­tomer is will­ing to spend mon­ey on?

This requires exten­sive sales mes­sage iter­a­tion.

Let me explain.

Some prod­uct devel­op­ment method­olo­gies focus on build­ing a rapid pro­to­type, get­ting feed­back, and iter­at­ing prod­uct revi­sions based on the feed­back.

The premise of these approach­es is that it’s eas­i­er to get the prod­uct right by putting some­thing con­crete in front of the cus­tomer to see how they react to it. Do they love it? Do they hate it? Do they look at you con­fused?

In many ways, this is a clas­sic inno­va­tion research and devel­op­ment process.

Well, the same process needs to (but sad­ly doesn’t) occur around sales mes­sage devel­op­ment.

What mes­sage res­onates with prospects deeply enough that they buy? What promise does the prospect want you to make that gets them excit­ed enough to buy?

You need to fig­ure out this mes­sage because it is this proven sales mes­sage that forms one of the three foun­da­tion­al pil­lars to scal­ing up.

Some­times, you stum­ble upon the exact right mes­sage through sheer dumb luck. Maybe the world shift­ed, and you had exact­ly the right prod­uct and mes­sage at exact­ly the right time.

(If this hap­pens, be smart enough to real­ize that you got lucky… and take advan­tage of it.)

Some­times, you get a sales-ori­ent­ed founder who has dis­cov­ered the sales mes­sage that res­onates, but they can’t get the product/market fit to work. These types of founders are phe­nom­e­nal at mak­ing the promis­es that get cus­tomers to buy, but they fail to deliv­er on those promis­es.

Some­times, the company’s first few sales­peo­ple have an ini­tial surge of sales due to their per­son­al net­work. They get in the door with prospects because of a pri­or rela­tion­ship.

If your goal is to get sales by any means nec­es­sary, this kind of sales­per­son is fine. If your goal is to build a scal­able sales mod­el, this kind of sales­per­son is not help­ful.

To scale sales, you need to know what mes­sage is going to open doors. Which webi­nar top­ics get prospects to sign up? What mes­sage is intrigu­ing enough that it secures the sales meet­ing? What promise is so irre­sistible that it con­sis­tent­ly clos­es the deal?

3. Favor­able Cus­tomer Con­ver­sion Eco­nom­ics

The final pre­req­ui­site to scal­ing is favor­able cus­tomer con­ver­sion eco­nom­ics. In the SaaS indus­try, we typ­i­cal­ly use the LTV/CAC ratio (the life­time val­ue of a customer/customer acqui­si­tion cost). In short, if you spend $1 to acquire a cus­tomer, how much mon­ey do you get back in sales over the customer’s life­time?

If you spend $1 to get $3+ back, that’s a ratio that is scal­able.

If you spend $1 to get $0.50 back, that ratio stinks. If you scale up big and fast with those kinds of eco­nom­ics, you sim­ply go bank­rupt faster.

Back in the late 1990s, there was an inter­net start­up named Koz­mo. They were a deliv­ery ser­vice in New York City that allowed you to order gro­ceries, books, movies, etc. for deliv­ery with­in an hour. The most pop­u­lar item they deliv­ered was a sin­gle pint of Ben & Jerry’s ice cream. The price per order was $5. The ful­ly loaded cost to deliv­er that order was $65.

The CEO decid­ed that the best step was to scale up… you know, go big or go home. After rais­ing $120 mil­lion in cap­i­tal, the com­pa­ny went out of busi­ness. Umm… lots of cash can mask sh*tty math… but it can’t do it for­ev­er.

If you have favor­able con­ver­sion eco­nom­ics, then it is the right time to scale.

If your data shows that you spend $1 mil­lion and get $4 mil­lion back, that’s a great deal.

If you can spend $10 mil­lion and get $40 mil­lion back, that’s also a great deal.

(Some­times, the ratio changes as you grow, so you have to keep an eye on the math.)

When your prod­uct works, solves a prob­lem that cus­tomers care about enough to pay to solve, you know how to sell it, and you have eco­nom­ics that work, then you scale.

With each lev­el of growth, you want to recheck the fun­da­men­tals. If they still hold, you want to scale even more.

There is a time and place for every­thing. There is a right time to scale. If you try to scale too ear­ly, you need to have (and be will­ing to burn) a lot of cash until you get the pre­req­ui­sites in place, in par­al­lel with the scal­ing process. Most who try don’t pull it off.

In my view, the “first mover” advan­tage isn’t as impor­tant as the “first to get it right” advan­tage.

Additional Resources

If you enjoyed this arti­cle, I rec­om­mend join­ing my email newslet­ter. You’ll be noti­fied when I pub­lish oth­er arti­cles and help­ful guides for improv­ing your SaaS busi­ness. Sub­mit the form below to sign up. Also, use the email icon below to share this arti­cle with some­one else who might find it use­ful.

If you’re the founder and CEO of a SaaS com­pa­ny look­ing for help in devel­op­ing a dis­tri­b­u­tion chan­nel strat­e­gy, please Click Here for more info.

Yes, I want to receive free arti­cles on
How to Scale and Grow a SaaS Busi­ness
 
First Name *
Email *

This form col­lects your email so that we can send you the free mate­ri­als you request­ed. Check out our Pri­va­cy Pol­i­cy for details on how we pro­tect and man­age your sub­mit­ted data.

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail
author avatar
Vic­tor Cheng
Author of Extreme Rev­enue Growth, Exec­u­tive coach, inde­pen­dent board mem­ber, and investor in SaaS com­pa­nies.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top